A professional meeting was held to prepare the comparative analysis of the Chess Palace and CogniPlay pedagogical systems. The two approaches share a common foundation: playful learning, the development of rule‑based thinking, the support of children’s active engagement, and the emphasis on the teacher’s role as a reflective guide.

During the discussion, we reviewed the differing system logics of the two frameworks. While Chess Palace offers a coherent, chess‑based learning universe, CogniPlay represents an open, conceptual, and adaptive educational architecture capable of integrating a wide variety of games and learning situations into a unified system. The two methodologies are highly compatible, and their strengths can mutually reinforce one another.